Politicians should be advocates for their voters’ needs and interests. Those are the special interests of those specific voters in that specific region. In my idealized vision the politicians representing one localized group meets with other appointed representatives of other groups with similar interests and creates a special interest group that is working for the people. A fantasy …maybe, but, a necessary fantasy in order to agree with Bentley’s concept of politics being a result of groups interacting with each other.
But politicians aren’t just interacting with each other, there are outside influences. Influences that look a lot more like the traditional special interest groups we have come consider evil, like “big oil” companies or the tobacco industry. Evil or not these groups are a part of the political picture, just like the media corporations. Which means that the American media corporations are political special interest groups.
The media is the politician’s connection to the American people. Newspapers, television, radio and the Internet allow the actions of the government to be reported to the people. However, this is not act performed out of the goodness of the corporation’s capitalist heart. Media corporations must keep in mind their main interest and goal – to create a sellable product – while reporting on politics. Media needs to make the actions of the politicians an interesting story. The consumer has to want to buy the product that story. If the story “doesn’t sell” then the corporation isn’t making money, and if the corporation isn’t making money it won’t stay in business very long. But if we were to lose these media corporations, then we would loose our connection to government. The interaction between the media corporations and the political special interest groups is what ties the whole process together. Each is dependent on the actions of the other group, while continually focusing on their own interests, which is why I believe that American media corporations must be special interest groups.
1 comment:
Good post. I do agree with you that media companies form a powerful special interest group. Their control over the extension of copyright terms alone has dramatically changed the way Americans produce popular culture in this country.
So as you argue that media platforms struggle to produce a sellable product, I’m wondering how it is that “unsellable” reforms – not those that are unsound, but those that aren’t “sexy” or convey excitement – get communicated to the larger masses of our society. If a tax program adds a 6% revenue increase to allow rural students to afford a slightly better education, who champions that story? Unless some controversial angle emerges, I fear the media’s ability to organize groups around social causes is directly related to how exciting and entertaining explaining those cases can be.
Anyway, something to worry about. I appreciate your thoughts. You had a couple of punctuation errors, watch out for that. Otherwise, keep up the good work.
Post a Comment